
Ruined Royal Park Hospital Heritage Precinct - Mortuary/Pathology block
being “redeveloped” for Games athletes’ accommodation.
Phot
by Julianne Bell, April 2005
This
bulletin contains an account of highlights of the past action-packed six
months. The “Games Village” dominates the news. Most people realise the 2006
Commonwealth “Games Village” is located on the 20-hectare site of the former
Royal Park Psychiatric Hospital in Parkville. It is a private property
development in disguise. The
inappropriately named “Parkville Gardens”, being built by Australand and
the Citta Property Group, is a high-density, concrete, wall-to-wall
conurbation, which will be used to accommodate most of the 6,000 athletes and
officials during the March 2006 Games. (There is some doubt, however, whether
the officials will now stay at the “Village” – many must be having second
thoughts about the overcrowded accommodation on offer.) Only 200 or so
permanent houses and units out of the total 1,000 dwellings are being built for
occupation during the Games. The shortfall in accommodation will be solved, it
is claimed by Games Minister Madden, by provision of 115 portable, corrugated
iron, self-contained, so-called “cottages” to be located on the expanded site.
A perimeter security fence of 3 metres in height with security cameras and
lights will be erected to enclose the whole expanded “Village” site. A local wit has pointed out that these
detention centre type features are intended to keep overseas athletes in
the “Village” (and so prevent defections) rather than intruders out. The
“Village” construction is running behind schedule.
In
February 2005, in order to “ease the squeeze” in the overcrowded “Village” the
State Government decided to occupy the neighbouring Reggio-Calabria Club and
the adjacent soccer field for location of portable offices and for staff
carparking. In addition the Village is
to expand further into the grounds of the Mental Health Research Institute of
Victoria and occupy the road reserve outside the Juvenile Justice Centre and
CSL in Oak Street. (A section of Oak Street between Park and Manningham Streets
is to be closed.) It was then discovered that, contrary to previous promises
made by Games Minister Madden that he would “never, ever” authorise alienation
of Royal Park for the Games, the State Government had decided to take 7
hectares of west Royal Park (the Ross Straw Field and the newly created
“Wetlands”) for a “break out area” for the athletes. The truth is that open space on the “Village” site had been
reduced from 5 hectares to 1.8 hectares and so there are no exercise areas for
the 4,500 athletes. The one sports field on the site has been shrunk to become
the “Village Green” and, as mentioned above, the adjacent soccer field taken
over for portable offices. This decision was inadvertently leaked at a meeting
of the Games Village Community Liaison Committee (a token consultative
committee) on 2 February 2005 and later confirmed at a briefing held
specifically for RPPG on 14 February by the Office of Commonwealth Games
Coordination, Melbourne 2006 and VIC Police on “Games Village Plans for Games
Mode”. No actual plans are yet
available.
Printed
and distributed with the assistance of a community grant from the City of
Melbourne
Guarantees
Sought for Restoration of Royal Park after the Games: The associated infrastructure – the
perimeter security fence, security lights, security cameras and road barriers -
could be installed as early as January 2006 and the area of Royal Park west –
the Ross Straw Field and Wetlands “locked down”. Hence all park users including sports groups will be excluded
from the Park possibly for six months. On 14 April 2005 RPPG spoke at the City
of Melbourne Planning and Environment Committee to urge Councillors to obtain
guarantees from the State Government that the “Village” perimeter security
fence and allied infrastructure works be dismantled and removed from Royal Park
immediately after the Games and that the State Government undertake restoration.
The fear is that, as the sunset clause of the Games legislation is 2011, that
Royal Park could remain fenced off and left as sports grounds for the
“Parkville Gardens”. In fact there is some danger it could be permanent.
Review
by Auditor General of Victoria of the Tenders and Contracts of the Games
Village: In February RPPG
made a submission to the Auditor General of Victoria on the contracts for the
2006 Games Village Our legal advisor had prepared the memorandum analysing the
contracts. This showed that they unduly favour the developer over the State
Government. (For starters the Government has given the 20 hectares “Village”
land - conservatively valued at $250 million- to the developer.) At the end of
March RPPG sent a second submission to the Auditor General commenting on the
expansion of the Games Village into Royal Park and surrounding areas (including
the Reggio Calabria Club and soccer field, the Mental Health Research Institute
of Victoria and Oak Street between Park and Manningham Streets) and asking what
additional contracts or variation to existing contracts are to be made. On 2
June RPPG representatives plus our legal adviser met the AG team undertaking
the review and raised important issues to us such as the alienation of parkland
for the “Village.”
Submission
on Security of Games Village: In
late March 2005 RPPG’s representative made a submission to the Premier with a
copy to the Auditor General Victoria on the security of the Games Village. The Victoria Police’s security arrangements
were seen to be completely inadequate (As mentioned above, RPPG members went to
a police briefing and so realise the implications for inadequate security cover
of the “Village”.) It should be noted
that, since January 2003, RPPG has pointed out in correspondence with
Government that the Royal Park site is a completely unsuitable location for a
Games Village - one reason being that it is difficult if not impossible to
secure.
Destruction
of the Royal Park Hospital Heritage Precinct:
The above photo shows the Mortuary
Pathology block of the former Royal Park Psychiatric Hospital, which has been
partially wrecked by demolition of the western annexes. Further damage is likely to be inflicted on
the building as construction is being fast tracked for accommodation for
athletes. The restoration of these
buildings was to have been undertaken after the Games, which would have
allowed more care to be taken. RPPG had
proposed that these buildings be retained as an historic interpretive centre on
the Royal Park Psychiatric Hospital dedicated to John Cade. After the Games it
will be used as a child-care centre, which we find inappropriate.
Resumption
of Operation of the Royal Park Master Plan Implementation Advisory
Committee: This
City of Melbourne Committee had not met for 9 months and resumed meeting on 9
March but at present is poorly serviced. At the last meeting on 18 May the
Royal Children’s Hospital’s presentation on the plans for redevelopment was
particularly alarming as staff indicated that the RCH would be taking over a
section of Royal Park over the construction phase, which could last until 2008,
and also indicated that there were plans to extend the RCH “footprint” into
Royal Park. Also of concern was the Dog
Walkers’ Group proposal for installation of a dog paddling pool and dog
drinking fountains in Royal Park.
Quote for the day: “Your
parks are your breathing spaces. Guard
them, cherish them. Parkland is valuable and greedy eyes see the money in it.
So you must always be on the alert. Hang onto your breathing spaces in this developing
and already over congested city. Protect your parks from the pressure of
political concrete”.
Patrick White 1972 Rally
at Centennial Park, Sydney.